Gold winner

BES10 Hosted wins Enterprise Service of the Year

Catch all the announcements

Watch the BlackBerry for Enterprise event replay

Growing

BlackBerry announces new partners and enterprise portfolio

portfolio of products and services

BlackBerry for Enterprise and Investor Day live blog!

a new era for enterprise mobility

BlackBerry hosting Enterprise event on November 13th

News & Rumors

BlackBerry hosting BES10 Secure Work Space webinar on July 30th

News & Rumors

Investment firm workers want their BlackBerry back

News & Rumors

Mexican conglomerate Grupo Salinas deploys BlackBerry 10 and BES10

Enterprise

BlackBerry's President of Enterprise talks about why they're opening up on MDM

News & Rumors

Government IT contractor SAIC upgrading to BES10

Editorial

Experiencing the BlackBerry Experience: New York

Enterprise

BlackBerry preparing for BES 5.0 SP4 MR7 rollout

Enterprise

BES 10.2 now available - Brings along BlackBerry Web Services for Universal Device Service

Enterprise

What is Secure Work Space?

Enterprise

BlackBerry issues statement on Air Force switch: 'There is nothing more secure than a BlackBerry'

Enterprise

What is BlackBerry Enterprise Server 10 (BES10)?

Site Stuff

Join me in welcoming back to the team our enterprise mobile expert, Craig Johnston!

Enterprise

BlackBerry knocks Knox in its latest blog post, reminding customers Samsung's vaults have faults

BlackBerry Apps

BBM used by more than 85 percent of BlackBerry Enterprise Server enabled organizations

BlackBerry Media

BlackBerry announces BES10.2 testing, enhancements and availability

< >

Strategy Analytics finds BlackBerry Enterprise Server to have the lowest total cost of ownership

Strategy Analytics Research Study finds the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution to have lowest Total Cost of Ownership
By Bla1ze on 22 Oct 2012 02:50 pm EDT
0
loading...
0
loading...
33
loading...

Strategy Analytics, who recently made headlines with the news of smartphones in use globally crossing 1 billion for the first time in the third quarter, has now released a new report comissioned by RIM wherein they found over the course of a year long study that the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution not only provides the most secure mobile platform but also the lowest total cost of ownership for mobile deployments.

“This study highlights that the cost of setting up and managing devices using a ‘Walled Garden’ architecture is more expensive than using BlackBerry Enterprise Server with BlackBerry smartphones,” said Andrew Brown, Director of Enterprise Research at Strategy Analytics. “When looking to define a cost-efficient, long-term enterprise mobility strategy, we would caution all organisations across both the public and private sectors to look at the total cost of supporting multiple devices with multiple operating systems over several years.”

Overall, the research shows that companies making use of non-BlackBerry smartphones that are managed using an MDM solution and offered VPN access cost 39% more than a BlackBerry Enterprise Server deployment and over time, that percentage of cost is only expected to rise.

As noted, cost wasn't the only thing looked at in the study either. Security of the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution was put to the test using a set of eleven key threats as a framework. It was found that the BlackBerry solution proved the most secure, scoring a low-threat level in ten of the eleven categories. Want to check out the full report yourself? You can download it from here (PDF) while the full press release can be viewed below.

Strategy Analytics Research Study finds the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution to have lowest Total Cost of Ownership

Study over one year shows that securely managing non-BlackBerry devices using a ‘Walled Garden’ approach is 39% more expensive

According to a new research study from Strategy Analytics, the BlackBerry® Enterprise Solution not only provides the most secure mobile platform but also the lowest total cost of ownership (TCO) for mobile deployments.

The study, commissioned by Research In Motion (RIM) (NASDAQ: RIMM; TSX: RIM), considered typical industry best practices, using the UK government as an example. The entire mobile solution was examined, including device management and devices themselves for a 100 user smartphone deployment running at IL2*, the minimum security standard for all Government departments including schools, health departments and local government. It compared two recommended approaches to mobility: the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution and a ‘Walled Garden’ approach to mobility where any non-BlackBerry device is given VPN access to a secure limited zone on a network and is managed by third-party mobile device management software. After one year, the cost to securely manage non-BlackBerry devices using a Walled Garden architecture was found to be 39% more expensive than BlackBerry devices in a BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) deployment. The analysis further indicated that a Walled Garden approach would continue to cost more than the BlackBerry solution in subsequent years.

“This study highlights that the cost of setting up and managing devices using a ‘Walled Garden’ architecture is more expensive than using BlackBerry Enterprise Server with BlackBerry smartphones,” said Andrew Brown, Director of Enterprise Research at Strategy Analytics. “When looking to define a cost-efficient, long-term enterprise mobility strategy, we would caution all organisations across both the public and private sectors to look at the total cost of supporting multiple devices with multiple operating systems over several years.”

Strategy Analytics also assessed the security of the BlackBerry® 7, Apple iOS® 5, Symbian S60 and Windows Phone 7 (WP7) operating systems, using eleven key threats as a framework. The BlackBerry solution proved the most secure, scoring a low-threat level in ten of the eleven categories. The report also found that the end-to-end architecture of the BlackBerry solution, including encryption for data-at-rest and in transit, mitigates the maximum amount of risk and offers essential support for corporate IT policies.

“OEMs and device OS manufacturers need to ensure greater technical controls on their platforms to limit platform vulnerabilities and other operating systems have a long way to go before they can be considered viable options,” concluded Brown.

Scott Totzke, Senior Vice President, BlackBerry Security Group at RIM said, “As the only mobile solution to be approved by the UK government to protect material classified up to and including ‘Restricted’, the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution continues to set the standard for mobile security. This research study also further underlines that at a time when all types of organisations are looking to drive efficiencies, the BlackBerry solution remains the most cost-effective enterprise mobility option.”

For a copy of the full report, please visit:   http://uk.blackberry.com/business/StrategyAnalyticsReport.pdf

About Research In Motion

Research In Motion (RIM), a global leader in wireless innovation, revolutionized the mobile industry with the introduction of the BlackBerry® solution in 1999. Today, BlackBerry products and services are used by millions of customers around the world to stay connected to the people and content that matter most throughout their day. Founded in 1984 and based in Waterloo, Ontario, RIM operates offices in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Latin America. RIM is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ: RIMM) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: RIM). For more information, visit www.rim.com or www.blackberry.com.

Reader comments

Strategy Analytics finds BlackBerry Enterprise Server to have the lowest total cost of ownership

17 Comments

Well businesses only care about whats cool than what is more durable and efficient to their business. they're dropping blackberry's because its not hip anymore. Seriously the facts show that blackberry's are more efficient for businesses cost wise and communication wise.

its a shame how true this is BES is so lightweight and works so amazingly... i have to *shudder* work with active sync and isheep and droids on most of my systems for the stuff i admin for and this month has been painful.. AD password expired isheep got lost as no emails are getting delivered to handhelds anymore ... all BB users are uneffected do to its AD integration.....

active sync drives me up the wall for the set up cost and the after cost to support the isheep after the AD password has expired

As I stated in the forum, the charts included in this study should be something that RIM should you using as key component in the marketing campaign to enterprise customers as well as in the stores with carriers.

Proud owner of a BlackBerry Playbook & Torch
www.xposeurphoto.com

But BlackBerry 10 uses ActiveSync therefore the same complaints you raise will apply to Research In Motion's own BlackBerry devices. They keep shooting themselves in the foot.

Interesting report, but I absolutely hate it when authors exagerate results by not using proper axis as in the case of the 2nd graph that a quick glance might lead to the conclustion that it is twice as cheap going with the Blackberry option, yet if you look at the axis, and the actual value the difference is around 14%. (And they do state this, but if you're skimming, you'll miss it)

Still, I'm quite impressed that BES would be cheaper. I was always under the assumption that it would be massively cheaper to go with other services and hence companies were willing to sacrifice a little security for a decrease in costs.

The problem is that these days it's not the IT dep that's making the descisions to leave BB. It's the CEO's who want to use their iPhones & tell IT to "make it happen."

I was wondering what BB got a "High Risk" mark for...But felt better when I saw everyone got a "High Risk" mark for "Week Software Implementation Error Exploitation"

BlackBerry is cheaper, more cost-effective and more secure. I'm glad I didn't go android AND add to my websavviness, I'm glad spying eyes won't be seeing my data. Nothing to hide, but security rules.

This report comes from a UK company. The last time I looked Europe is much different than North America when it comes to wireless PDA cell devices. So this report is only good if you live in Europe it doesn't account or do any research in the United States of America or Canada so means nothing to the rest of us.

The OP really needs to stop blowing smoke up his butt and the people in NA with these kind of reports. :)