Join Our 3 MILLION+ Members Today! Register Here | Login
Login or Register to post comments

55 Comments

Posted by johnnymac Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Was using the Canadian version of 3.0 beta for the past few weeks and loving it. Now hopping on the official 3.0 train and couldn't be happier.

I'm sure some folks will bit** about the requirement of a Plus subscription to have caching, but it's worth it in my opinion. I find I'm using my almost-full 16Gb worth of on-device music less and less now. Unattended night time caching via WiFi is oh-so-sweet.

 
 
Posted by JoelTruckerDude Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Yeah, I've been using the Canadian version the past few weeks as well and tried the 14 day trial and believe me unless yours is different than mine, the wireless caching is WAY slower than using the USB, I tried it overnite like I do using the USB cord and it wasn't even to the halfway mark by the next morning and I have a 20mb connection.

 
 
Posted by njaremka Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

LAME!!! - "** The BlackBerry 8830 smartphone is not currently supported with Slacker for BlackBerry 3.0"

 
 
Posted by wcmarchese Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I think there should be at least wired cashing. I will not be upgrading until something like this happens. I love Slacker, and I've purchased a LOT of music I either remembered or didn't know was out there, and that alone I feel should be the real reason for these radio programs, but I really don't use it THAT much to warrent the price of Slacker Plus.

Lets see what happens.

WCM

 
 
Posted by JoelTruckerDude Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

They didn't take away the option of caching with your USB, they just added the option to do it wireless as well.

 
 
Posted by sredd68 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

They didn't take it away but you cannot cache at all, according to the article, without a Plus(pay) account

 
 
Posted by papped Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Playing usb cached stations will work for 14 days, then it will stop completely. Caching is no longer free.

 
 
Posted by elmackpapa Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Can you confirm with 100% certainty that they didn't take away USB-wired cashing for non-paid users? The article specifically states:

"Before you get too excited, there is a catch with upgrading to 3.0 that some people may not be happy about -- caching, whether done via wired connection or wirelessly -- will now only be available on a Slacker Plus account."

 
 
Posted by elmackpapa Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

14 days only? That's too bad. Thanks.

 
 
Posted by AndrewB55 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Doesn't look like its working for the 8330 either. I just logged on to the site and its only allowing me to access 2.0

Anyone else?

 
 
Posted by gosfaba2x2 Wednesday, Feb 24, 2010 718 days ago

It's not working for me either. . .

 
 
Posted by egeorgia Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Have been waiting for this since I signed up a month ago. I only signed up when I heard about the wireless caching. The only problem I have ever had with Slacker is caching on the computer was very inconsistent. I would get error messages all the time. Plus every time you put a new OS or hybrid on you would lose all the music. It was a big hassle. Now I can "set it and forget it". I am caching my stations as we speak in the cradle on my desk. Hopefully it is very dependable and doesn't give me the same errors as wired caching did. Worth the $4.99 a month for sure. My XM costs $14.99. This way I get stations I have customized and get new content all the time and don't have to hassle downloading songs all the time. Nice work. One of my favorite apps since the beginning.

 
 
Posted by mprewers Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I'm sick of stupid verizon putting download links on my phone without my permission of apps like this. First Bing, now this dumpy radio app.

 
 
Posted by LoSt180 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Thanks for the heads up before I made the mistake of upgrading. Caching only on premium accounts is a deal breaker (for me). I don't use it enough to justify a subscription.

 
 
Posted by JoelTruckerDude Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

So if you don't use it enough to justify a subscription, then why not upgrade, streaming is still FREE.

 
 
Posted by LoSt180 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Weak signal inside the building at work, spotty signal in certain spots on the interstate home, and cached stations are easier on the battery are a few reasons I prefer not to stream.

 
 
Posted by JoelTruckerDude Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I hear ya, and given the batt life on the storm 2 isn't like the S1, although the latest leaks and hybrids have juiced mine back up tremendously.

 
 
Posted by papped Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Because the primary benefit of Slacker in the first place is the caching...

If I purely wanted to stream then I would just use Pandora since their suggestion algorithm is about 1000x better than Slacker.

 
 
Posted by JoelTruckerDude Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

While I understand what your saying, it's like comparing Apples to Oranges though because Slacker wasn't developed as a suggestion only app like Pandora, yes the feature is there, but what I like the best with Slacker is I can choose what "genre" I want to listen to based on the mood I'm in and if I want to change to the opposite end of the spectrum I can with the push of a couple of buttons. With Pandora you get what is pumped through based on your liking or disliking and if I wanted to change to something besides what's in my playlist I have to search for it based off of keywords entered, but hey to each their own right. I do use Pandora, just not as often as Slacker.

 
 
Posted by papped Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

The issue is that anybody who relied on the caching as the primary draw will view *ALL* future updates as useless. Eventually I am sure they will force an upgrade at some point too, just a matter of when. Whether Slacker has other merits or not, this will push non-paid users to Pandora for sure.

 
 
Posted by Xader Thursday, Feb 25, 2010 717 days ago

Agreed.

Caching is the only thing that keeps me using Slacker at all. And it has too many problems for me to be willing to pay for it (i.e. No BT A/V remote support, unable to resume song after alerts, etc).

Without caching, I find Pandora to be superior in every way. If they fix all of the problems, then I MIGHT consider upgrading, but until that happens, it's a deal-breaker.

 
 
Posted by jpyoung Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Thanks but no thanks! I as well will not be using 3.0 I will be sticking with the 2.0 version. I think Slacker is a great application but not worth the money for me. I use the caching feature often but can't justify the cost. I don't mind connecting to my computer to cache the stations, seems like they could offer the wireless caching for the premium edition and keep the wired caching as it was. But, then again people really like the caching feature and I think Slacker realized that so why not charge for it all.

 
 
Posted by mjbesen310 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

no way will I be gettign 3.0! not paying to upgrade like that per month... I'll keep 2.0 as it never gave me a problem

 
 
Posted by jlb21 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I don't cache but I don't want to lose that option. Sticking with my current version.

 
 
Posted by pkcable Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

They should do a contest and give a ton of subscriptions to give away!

 
 
Posted by JoelTruckerDude Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I agree, but it should be contest to see who the biggest WHINER is out here in the comments, it's called comment section, not b1tching or whining section. I think CB should lock down the comment section on all of these blogs as it usually tends to look like a thread from the "Rants and Raves" forum anyway. There's a difference between stating an opinion and bitching and whining about something.

 
 
Posted by xs11e Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I'm much less interested in hearing about a new version of Slacker than I would be in hearing about how to permanently and forever remove the @$^&*$ worthless app that VZW pushes to my phone!

 
 
Posted by thozgyz Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I'm in michigan. I have the 3.0 Canada version for a few weeks now with no problem. Should I get the us version, is there a difference? Maybe more Brian Adams with the Canada version or something. Lol. Just wanted to know of I should bother.

 
 
Posted by JoelTruckerDude Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Michigan here also, the music stays the same as it goes by licensing and when you registered your account with Slacker you put that u was in the US, so it gives you the same music you've been getting, I've been using it for a few weeks now too with all the same lineup I had with 2.0

 
 
Posted by Pathtek4 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I've never been one to put down an app, but seriously, this is way too expensive for my taste imo. With sirius having an app now, I can just pay the extra 2.99 a month to go along with my yearly satellite subscription and get the same thing but with more stations and shows. Sorry slacker, your officially history in my books, sirius is the way to go, I've had it for 4 years now

 
 
Posted by sredd68 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Won't be upgrading to 3.0, I already pay for Sirius in my vehicle so it makes no sense to have two paid radio apps. 2.0 serves me just fine.

 
 
Posted by papped Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Trying out the sirius trial now, must say the 128kb sounds really good... The app is slick and easy to use too.

 
 
Posted by bradbourne Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I think people are confused by this upgrade. They added wireless cacheing for paid subscribers, but you can still cache via USB. There services is still available free of charge, nothing in that regards has changed.

As a paid subscriber and former Sirius subscriber I love the new addition, and the GUI is a lont nicer and quicker as well.

 
 
Posted by papped Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Incorrect. You have 14 days of USB caching, then it will say your trial expired.

USB caching is a paid service now.

 
 
Posted by ChuckH0308 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

My only complaint for the old version was that you couldn't advance songs with the BT headphone controls. I am disappointed to see that it still isn't possible. I don't know about on BB, but PAndora allows this on Android. Sure wish we could get that on Slacker because otherise I love it!

 
 
Posted by johnnymac Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

yes with the BB using Pandora stereo BT advance pause/play, etc is supported. I too wish that Slacker had that.....

 
 
Posted by gottabcb Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Anyone else seeing Slacker 3.0 stop the song 5 seconds in to buffer? It wasn't doing this until I installed 3.0. It's not even occasional, it's every damn song.

 
 
Posted by jpepping Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I don't fly that often but when I do having the cache was great. I will not be upgrading until the offer free USB cache, I can live without the wireless refresh.

Bad move IMHO to have to pay for cache, if I have to stream I will look for other radio options.

 
 
Posted by elmackpapa Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Agreed, bad move to now charge for what was previously free. The wireless caching alone should be part of the paid subscription, or even if they only limited free users to 3 cached stations vs none.

 
 
Posted by dreamer3kx Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

I love slacker and would pay one flat low priced fee but I cant do monthly, guess ill be sticking with 2.0.

 
 
Posted by CrackCurve56 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Can I have both Slacker 2.0 and 3.0 on my BB Bold 9700? I have Radio Plus on it.

 
 
Posted by papped Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

They have the same module names, so they will override each other.

 
 
Posted by nyr2k2 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Nice. I love me my Slacker. Caching right now!

 
 
Posted by dfoi180 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Sirius is the way to go if you like crap audio, dj's who have a inflated opinion about themselves, songs that are so often repeated it sounds like the old days of Top 40 radio just to name a few.

Had XM for years, had SiriusXM, had a big headache, had to say are you serious?

Just received postal mail today from them. New promotion
5 months for 20 dollars. Was going to shred it but I just opened it. Here is one of the questions in the letter.

Question Don't you miss commercial free music?
Answer Not yours.

Besides the receiver is now buried somewhere in a landfill.

I'll take Slacker over Sirius any day. Even if Sirius was free.

 
 
Posted by Pathtek4 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Pfft...haha, what a joke post! Seriously? You can take your slacker and sack up with it. The fact that you originally picked XM over Sirius lets all of us know that your personally opinion of products is crap. But whatever, if you enjoy genre's over content, thats your business, but don't spew your garbage opinion on the net

 
 
Posted by kc tony Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

following message on my BB following after the upgrade:

“error starting Slacker_radio: error loading module ‘slacker_radio’ out of Memory Error”

 
 
Posted by mav11703 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

How can everyone here pay over $100 for a cell phone bill and then bitch that Slacker is too expensive? This is a great service, and everyone here uses it. So pay for it and stop whining. We are talking about $4 a month. You probably spend that once a day on a cup of coffee. What is with people that want everything for free? Go use your free Pandora, which I think is inferior to this service (in my opinion).

 
 
Posted by papped Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Not sure what $4 a month for radio service has to do with mandatory cellphone plan prices... If you want a smartphone, you have to buy a smartphone and you need a plan. I think most people are not that likely to fork over $4 a month just for radio service despite the obligatory and overused coffee/device cost comparisons...

 
 
Posted by mav11703 Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 719 days ago

Yes you need a plan, but is it worth it for $10 for unlimited text? or $40 for internet? $4 a month or $60 a year is not even half your monthly bill. I used the coffee analogy because everyone I know will spend money on coffee. Didn't want to give you a overused comparison. How about a $5 ham sandwich for lunch? Is that better?

 
 
Posted by papped Wednesday, Feb 24, 2010 718 days ago

That's the point though, caching *was* free. A new feature was added (wifi caching), understandable that it costs, but something else was removed that used to be free.

And yes you can easily rack up way, way more than $10 without unlimited text plans since you get charged for incoming, not just outgoing.

"But you can just use 2.0...". Yeah, it just means your app is no longer supported, at all... They are not going to simultaneously update 2.0 and 3.0. I would not be surprised if 3.0 is forced at some point down the road either.