Join Our 3 MILLION+ Members Today! Register Here | Login
Login or Register to post comments

65 Comments

Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Let alone that people are using up the old technology. Little do they know if they were not so cheap that there are "good" Blackberry's to be had. Maybe this has something to do with the bad economy?

 
 
Posted by BluesInTheNight Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Guess I missed the memo on that one. The older models are not that old.

 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Thought that it would be clear if I stated an opinion that it was an opinion. So in my opinion they are old out-dated and too slow for my tastes even my 9630 was pretty crappy till I got OS 5.0 on it.

 
 
Posted by papped Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

That doesn't have anything to do with how "new" it is.

The 9630 running 4.7.1 is slower than the 9000 running 4.6.X.

 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

9000 is in the same generation as 9630 same look feel yadda yadda in my opinion. If you don't enjoy my opinion ridicule it more...

 
 
Posted by papped Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Sure, same "generation" except the completely different chipset, different rev of the OS, different radios, etc etc... Not mentioning the difference in release time.

 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 724 days ago

But I already knew all that.

 
 
Posted by dlombardi24 Tuesday, Feb 09, 2010 724 days ago

enough, idiot.. dont hate on my curve!

 
 
Posted by diegonei Tuesday, Feb 09, 2010 724 days ago

Then we fail to see the point of your argument.

 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Wednesday, Feb 10, 2010 723 days ago

what arguement?

 
 
Posted by experiment626 Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

What a bogus sales statistic.They need to at least separate the sales numbers of each sub-series of Curve,the 83xx,85xx,and 8900 models.

 
 
Posted by skyboxer Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

We don't really know which devices sold the most. The capability difference in the curve line is vast, and lumping them together blurs what is really going on. And then to separate the 3G and 3G S? Aren't those phones more similar than say an 8310 and an 8900?

 
 
Posted by Ebscer Tuesday, Feb 09, 2010 724 days ago

For the early 2009 numbers I found out that the 8900 was not included. The 85xx series was not around at the time, so I don't know if these 4Q 2009 numbers include it or not (I would guess that they do)

 
 
Posted by Guy from SU Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

If the different curve models are lumped in together, shouldn't the iPhone's be lumped in together too?

EDIT: nevermind I read the rest of the post...

 
 
Posted by Lumute Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

It would be very interesting to see the actual sales numbers for that that list for that period... I would like to know total BlackBerries vs total Iphones (disregarding model)...

 
 
Posted by swamp_water Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

The consumer market is huge, but don't forget the corporate markets. They are selling the curves by the dozen. Also why wouldn't the pearl do so well? People don't always want a bulky phone.

Time to grow out of your geek shell guys. Not everybody wants a tour or bold.

 
 
Posted by bigtime2 Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

I know that my company is still issuing 8320's and 8820's even though the 8520 and 9700 were released late last year.

Probably because the economy is not doing as great as everyone was expecting, so cheaper phones save money, I guess.

 
 
Posted by sheltonn Tuesday, Feb 09, 2010 724 days ago

Hey

The other thing that is keeping these companies buying curves is the fact the various departments take forever and a month to approve new technology. everyone and there dog knows trackballs suck. they have so many issues and that the new trackpads are working significantly better. but someone has to sign off. and that takes for ever.

 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago
 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

IMO The current Pearl models 8100 whatevers are completely inferior to the newer, faster processor, better screen resolution much more caapable not waiting for hour-glass Blackberry's. But hey that's my opinion stay back in time all you want with all the old guys :p

 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Woops double post

 
 
Posted by artie Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

I have an 8130 and will put up with the "Hour Glass" theme "till Tour 2 comes to Sprint. My choice, my money, my time. I will miss the "SureType", just want a larger screen.

 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Because I like typing with one hand. I'm currently on the Tour but I don't think screen resolution will hold me back we shall see. =)

 
 
Posted by artie Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Some applications aren't totally visible because of the small screen, eg: Poynt, OntoCalendar.. maybe they work better on a larger screen.

 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 724 days ago

But I use very few apps. I think the resolution is supposed to be better on the 9100 than that of the 8100 i don't remember for sure what it was though.

 
 
Posted by gafly Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

I too agree that they should either lump the 3G and the 3GS together or separate the curve models... either way will work.

 
 
Posted by interfasys Tuesday, Feb 09, 2010 724 days ago

Agreed. I'm pretty sure the iPhone would be #1. The 3G and the 3GS are basically the same device.

 
 
Posted by jay74 Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Who cares BlackBerry is #1 !!!! :)

 
 
Posted by CrackberryBrandon Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

The results aren't fair Rhys why people care if the iPhone was lumped together we all know who would be number 1

 
 
Posted by Thogek Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

And if the BlackBerries were lumped together?

Since the two lines (BlackBerry and iPhone) aren't neatly analogous, any sort of lumping-together of either is going to produce somewhat arbitrary comparison results...

 
 
Posted by richro Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Surprised to see the Palm Pre outsell the Tour!

 
 
Posted by joshua.worth Monday, Feb 08, 2010 724 days ago

Kinda silly

 
 
Posted by BBThemes Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Blackberry 8520 has been the highest selling CONTRACT (thats outta all phones, not just smartphones) device for every week this year so far in the UK across all networks!! impressive!

 
 
Posted by bigtime2 Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

MyTouch 3G is in top 10? Wow. I was not expecting that at all.

 
 
Posted by zkyevolved Tuesday, Feb 09, 2010 724 days ago

i agree... I have it, or rather, had it, and I didn't like it much. It's a neat little phone, but it's not comparable to any blackberry. I'd take the 8300 over the magic any day. haha.

 
 
Posted by Xopher Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

I'm just amazed that half of the list is all five of the Blackberry devices in their current lineup.

I wonder, if RIM didn't have to split up the Bold and Tour lines, how would the two models do in the list as one device?

 
 
Posted by CrackberryBrandon Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Of course if they grouped the iPhones together they would win apple has sold 75 million iPhones while blackberrysightongs whole line up has die the same. Emphasis on whole line- up

 
 
Posted by mrspock2002 Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

RIM sold over 45 million phones in 1 quarter with over 35 million new customers in 1 quarter.

 
 
Posted by secretsexyninja Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Um.... no??? Look at RIM's own statement. This last quarter they sold a RECORD 10 million. No way they did 45 million in one quarter.

They also said, "to date, 75 million" blackberrys have been sold. That is a LOT less than what you're saying.

That said.... I think the Android platform is going to take over. I'm going to sell my storm 9350 and jump on the Nexus One the second Verizon releases it this Spring. Can't wait

 
 
Posted by gafly Monday, Feb 08, 2010 724 days ago

Q4 2009 Unit Shipments
- RIM 10.7 million
- APL 08.7 million

YR 2009 Unit Shipments
- RIM 34.5 million
- APL 25.1 million

 
 
Posted by kimmy2 Monday, Feb 08, 2010 724 days ago

They rule blackberries that is 8330 and all the rest of them.

 
 
Posted by six4seven Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

How is this possible?? The 8300 series is such a piece of sh*t!! The Curve is garbage.

 
 
Posted by kimmy2 Monday, Feb 08, 2010 724 days ago

U know what! Sh!,

 
 
Posted by cwong15 Monday, Feb 08, 2010 725 days ago

Is it really unfair to Apple to separate their iPhones into 2 categories, when RIM's BlackBerry phones are divided into 5 categories? It's the same platform, really. The BlackBerry software that I've written will run on every single one of those BlackBerry models. Arguably, separating RIM's phones into 5 categories puts the BlackBerry line at a disadvantage.

A more meaningful ranking should rank phones according to the underlying platform: iPhone OS, BlackBerry OS, WebOS (Palm), Android etc.

 
 
Posted by Blechtman Monday, Feb 08, 2010 724 days ago

But are they really necessary? If apple sold 8 trillion phones would it really make them better? I'm not bashing apple but don't understand why the fan boys spend so much time on THIS site trying to convince berry users that apple is superiorm

On the other hand, I'm sure iphones would sell much more if they were available on more than 1 carrier

 
 
Posted by keith.randy Monday, Feb 08, 2010 724 days ago

The only reason that the curve is the best selling smartphone in america is because there are like 3 different version of it and it is available on 5 or 6 different carriers. I guarantee you if the curve was exclusive to evil ass at&t and had to be on the expensive data plan like the iPhone it would even come close. So don't get too high on your horse there blackberry

 
 
Posted by brad162 Tuesday, Feb 09, 2010 724 days ago

well that just shows how smart RIM is to not restrict the device to any one carrier. That is why they are outselling apple, because people have their carrier of choice and not being stuck with lame at&t.. i have had two iphones and at&t's network is just as bad as it was when it was Cingular, so at this point they've had 3 chances to prove themselves to me, and im totally done with them.

 
 
Posted by flawson Tuesday, Feb 09, 2010 724 days ago

When I did my due diligence last year on my 1st smartphone, the 8330 was one of the very best rated for what I was looking for. Fast forward a few months and its outdated and probably never to be updated again(8330m) I would love a 9700 but I am not on the right carrier and I really can't afford the hundreds of dollars to get an unlocked phone or break contracts. It doesn't mean I'm cheap or out of touch. However, I will probably get the "Summit 11020" or the "Jupiter 22000" or whatever it is when the contract's up...and then it will be outdated in 3 months.
Sorry, bit of a rant, my point is this- if the "entry-level" devices pull new people into RIM world, and they end up sticking with them, isn't that awesome for blackberryland? Or is it really just about hating on anything that costs less than the price of a notebook computer?

 
 
Posted by Grandpa1947 Tuesday, Feb 09, 2010 724 days ago

It is an impressive feat for sure. When I look at the list I see the Droid making good gains. With more and more phones coming into the market, like the Droid, how much longer can Blackberry hold on. Faster processors, multi-touch, led screens, and thousands of apps might just have an impact next year. Especially if iphone goes to Verizon.

 
 
Posted by Azothyran Monday, Feb 15, 2010 718 days ago

Don't forget about the things RIM has planned for the BlackBerry platform though. Flash, Webkit, Widgets, OS 5.1...all of this is going to contribute to RIM as well.