Join Our 3 MILLION+ Members Today! Register Here | Login
Login or Register to post comments

8 Comments

Posted by veii Wednesday, Feb 23, 2011 457 days ago

Looks good.

 
 
Posted by jaknife Wednesday, Feb 23, 2011 457 days ago

We use this at work for our email server instead of MS Exchange, works really well and much cheaper. The latest version which includes BES Express is great, would highly recommend it.

 
 
Posted by lcohen999 Wednesday, Feb 23, 2011 457 days ago

We used to be resellers of MDaemon before RIM purchased them

Great product, never an issue (although we moved to a zero maintenance google apps for our clients) but my only frustration with their product was the insistence to ignore devices that use Activesync. IMAP IDLE is great but not supply supported across all mobile platforms

 
 
Posted by jaknife Wednesday, Feb 23, 2011 457 days ago

Activesync is supported now.

 
 
Posted by jhanks64 Wednesday, Feb 23, 2011 456 days ago

Mdaemon is a great email server for small business. I use it myself and am a reseller, so perhaps I'm a little bit biased.

The Blackberry Integration with the new BES is superior to Android or iPhone support. The battery and data usage are far better than other platforms. Every client that tries it, loves it. It can use the cheaper "personal" BIS data plan and in most cases works with the smaller data plan just fine. It could easily save $180 - $300 each year for each phone compared to higher data plan usage of other platforms.

The ease of use of Mdaemon and efficiency of Blackberry BES with Mdaemon are a winning combination. The integration with Outlook when using Outlook Connector is spectacular.

Mdaemon 12 also supports SyncML and ActiveSync for Calendar and Contacts, the combination makes it possible to have about 2/3 of the integration on Android and iPhone, which is satisfactory for many users, but BB is the most complete and exceptional.

 
 
Posted by JRSCCivic98 Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 456 days ago

Windows 7 and Windows Vista ARE NOT server OSs. Whomever wrote that part should smack themselves.

Personally, I'd rather see a client invest in an MS SBS than a small-name solution such as this, but I'm biased on liking Exchange as an email server platform.

 
 
Posted by auditman Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 456 days ago

this is excellent for small businesses that couldnt afford real server or its not cost effective for them to get a server.

 
 
Posted by JRSCCivic98 Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 456 days ago

If it's not cost affective for them to have their own server, then they are better off letting their domain registrar host their email on a platform of their choosing. A lot of them offer hosted email on various platforms at very little cost if not already included in the price of their domain hosting package anyway. Running this on a workstation grade PC and calling it your business email solution for your office would be a bad joke the day that PC fails and you're left high and dry because you overlooked data backups or failover redundancy on the hard drives in the system. I see and have to replace more "cheap" solutions like this than I ever want to see on a yearly basis.

There's nothing wrong with not being able to afford a proper email server, but don't halfass it if you can't afford it. Use another solution or avenue that's just as inexpensive but offers a lot more redundancy and safety for your information.