Join Our 3 MILLION+ Members Today! Register Here | Login
Login or Register to post comments

10 Comments

Posted by rkevwill Tuesday, Sep 27, 2011 239 days ago

I have been having this thought lately, that perhaps HP and RIMM should put their heads together, and work on an OS that will benefit both of them. I hear WebOS has some nifty features and parts, and of course, we hear that QNX does likewise. Not saying it will work, just saying imho, perhaps they should be talking. They are both enterprise basic companies, and may be able to work together.

 
 
Posted by Brando0623 Tuesday, Sep 27, 2011 239 days ago

I agree with your opinion and both companies should look at their strong suits,HP/palm's systems with organization and RIM's with the e-mail and NOC.

 
 
Posted by cigardj Wednesday, Sep 28, 2011 239 days ago

BlackBerry and WebOS would be a wonder to say the least.

They are cut from the same wood and the loyalty that assist with both products customer base is astounding. Palm's biggest achilles in my opinion was their keyboards (something BB does better than all) and BB's weakness is of course the OS (something Palm does better than everyone).

Each company shares the spotlight for refusing to make phones with competitive screen real estate. The Torch 9810 should be minimum 3.5". The days of the 3-3.3" screens are over unless its a entry level device. In some cases they are a tad bit thick, but that can be said for the best Androids in many instances.

If QNX is our future, so be it, but it needs to virtually blow everything out of the water, otherwise, Crackberry may be on borrowed time (something I hope won't happen).

 
 
Posted by NFLPLAYBOOK Wednesday, Sep 28, 2011 239 days ago

I think WebOS was dropped because of QNX. QNX has a lot more fuctionality than WebOS would have. WebOSs advantages weren't enough to run up against QNX in the long run. WebOS is also harder to write to as well. I was never interested in the Pre. Didn't like the form factor. The best thing Rim could do is hire as many of the WebOS coders as they can get. They are very talented to say the least.

 
 
Posted by synthmole Wednesday, Sep 28, 2011 239 days ago

The comparison is apt, but not in a good way. The common theme in both of these OS's is the mistake of using web technologies for an SDK. This is also why RIM and Palm have been so late to market with competitive devices: they need really strong hardware to make up for poor performance of these choices, and then have to wait for the prices of said hardware to come down while their competitors are killing them in the market.

QFT:

"the phone would just bog down and lag for a minute or more while it attempted to clear space in the RAM. This was most evident in the web browser, where having three or four cards open would slow the phone to a crawl while we watched each card go to a giant gray spinner. It’s disheartening."

 
 
Posted by mavricxx Wednesday, Sep 28, 2011 239 days ago

They should have added more RAM, if you notice the current top of the line phones, they are all using 768mb-1gb RAM. This would have alleviated the problem.

 
 
Posted by Pearl9100 Wednesday, Sep 28, 2011 239 days ago

No, WebOS was dropped because it was not profitable to drain resources to make a phone and a mobile operating system that no one was buying. I agree with HP's move. They should continue to crack the business sector with servers and computers. That is where the money is. Forget the private sector.

 
 
Posted by theKHMERboy Wednesday, Sep 28, 2011 239 days ago

The qnx phone should still have the physical keyboard that everyone love on their bold/torch.. And it needs a front face camera for video chat.. Then the blackberry would catch up with their competitors

 
 
Posted by sk8er_tor Wednesday, Sep 28, 2011 239 days ago

What QNX looks like on a phone... no need to look further than an article on CB a couple of days ago. I know it's not real but gives people an idea.
http://bit.ly/pT6WEr

 
 
Posted by drakesaliasonline Wednesday, Sep 28, 2011 239 days ago

I might be wrong but wasn't RIM supposed to buy the WebOS like 2 or 3 years ago? I mean it RIM can't get in with Android (Google) then this looks like a reasonable route with a partnership with HP (or total take over of WebOS). Guess we'll have to see.