Join Our 3 MILLION+ Members Today! Register Here | Login
Login or Register to post comments

131 Comments

Posted by reddmann1976 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Can't wait for the BlackBerry Bold Touch!

 
 
Posted by birdman_36 Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

And the Monaco/Monza/Touch/Storm3 Torch 9850/9860

 
 
Posted by acrogenesis Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 238 days ago

Don't they look to small for the hand?

 
 
Posted by BGK Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

Hmm, small for a Bold Touch - my first thought too ........

 
 
Posted by 1magine Saturday, Jul 02, 2011 235 days ago

Is it just me or does the Monaco/Monza look a little on the long/thin side? Just a bit off balanced. Like it should have been as wide as the Bold. Maybe its just me.

 
 
Posted by mightymikek83 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

The bold looks nice, the torch ehhhhhh

 
 
Posted by sashas Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

ditto

 
 
Posted by WillieLee Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Some are going to complain about the physical buttons on that Torch.

 
 
Posted by RocPlayr Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

They look horrible. But what I really hate is the trackpad on touch phone. WHY?????? I feel myself gravitating toward a WP7 even though I love Blackberry. : (

 
 
Posted by drakesaliasonline Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

I welcome it, I mean have you ever tried to click the smallest link on a touch screen phone "without" zooming in? Does it work everytime? It just brings another form of navigation, I don't see anything wrong with it.

 
 
Posted by Cafeina Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

+1 Trackpad = good

 
 
Posted by jermaine1082 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Whyb is what I ask. that the lack of fine tuning the touch screen so u don't need to zoom to hit a key(iphone, and android) is what every touch phone is doing wrong. Unless u have small hands like my 4 year old. That is why I don't have a iphone, plus at least 5 other reason's mainly it's apple.

 
 
Posted by Maiev Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 238 days ago

Having played with the 9900. The stuff are just too small for accurate tapping.

I was still using trackpad and... being a blackberry user for the longest time, touching screen won't really come natural for awhile lol :3

 
 
Posted by zensen Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

the trackpad is a great inclusion. If you've ever used a torch before you'll realise how awesome it is for that pinpoint accuracy that your fingers won't be able to muster with editing of text and other hard to press buttons on websites etc.

I see no reason to get angry over a button like this?

It's like getting angry over the home button on the iphone.

 
 
Posted by Five50What Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 238 days ago

 at first I thought a trackpad added to a full touchscreen, is a no-no...but then I came to understand the benfits of it...now that I see the call/menu/go-back/end call buttons are actual physical buttons, hell NO! Ugly. Cheap. I need a "Full Touchscreen" BlackBerry...I mean they did away with the "click clack clunk" of the S1 and now no more "click clack" like the S2...and if we can't get a REAL "click" screen, n just go for all touchscreen(with a trackpad), then the only other buttons I want to have to push besides that trackpad are the camera and convenience keys 

 
 
Posted by zensen Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

have you used capacitive buttons on those androids. they can be very fickle.
I can understand users wanting them to be flushed into the design e.g the original torch. At least these buttons you won't accidentally slide over them like you can do with a capacitive button (thats if they register your touch properly)

though I can totally see them moving away from these buttons if and when QNX is implemented especially if they decide to take advantage of the bezels. all that said and touch, I'm still loving some hardware buttons and the trackpad.

I thought it was a huge mistake to get rid of the second convenience keys though.

 
 
Posted by Italiannyc Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Those buttons on there make that phone look extremely cheap. Not a torch btw

 
 
Posted by Bla1ze Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Well it certainly isn't a Storm lol.. All docs say Torch, even the early spec sheets say Torch..so unless you have something to say that I don't know about --  it's a Torch until otherwise proven not to be.

 
 
Posted by WillieLee Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Perhaps it is there to make clicking on links easier?

 
 
Posted by shlammed Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Torch would mean it's a slider...that thing is full touch.

 
 
Posted by Bla1ze Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Based on what? They can name name a device anything they want -- just because you have the Torch as a slider now and the 9810 as a slider doesn't mean they can't brand a non-slider as a Torch. Like I said above -- documentation currently shows it as a Torch.

Personally don't think it should be labled as a Torch but that's what all information suggests -- I've been waiting for someone to have accurate proof of it being something else. Easy to say it's not a Torch but provide no information to the contrary. I sincerly hope someone proves it not to be a Torch.

 
 
Posted by Italiannyc Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Click the link and it takes you to the page that says blackberry touch / monza .. So im assuming typo , cuz the torch slides up. But w.e

 
 
Posted by WillieLee Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

You're talking to Bla1ze, he wrote the article.

 
 
Posted by Bla1ze Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Miss this part of that article?

"Although at the top it does say Torch, that is presumably a typo in the information"

At the time -- it was assumed to be a typo. But with the Sprint info using the Torch branding as well, it's presumably NOT a typo.

Try reading beyond the title next time. ;)

 
 
Posted by Gregory Ryan Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Ive been listening through all the podcasts so i now read these comments in your voice. Thanks on the article and clearing up some of the confusion for some folk. Think you guys should do a 2011 device round up again.

 
 
Posted by AshDeezy Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Does the name "Pearl" mean it's a candybar form factor? Think Pearl 8200 and 8230. They are clamshells. RIM clearly uses its branding to appeal to certain consumer/business segment.

The argument could even be as simple as the 9850/9860 not having a surepress screen makes it a Torch, not a Storm.

Personally I don't think the "Touch" name falls in line with RIM's naming scheme... They tend to go for very unique and iconic names. Overall the Torch line has been successful...especially relative to the Storm series. I think it makes sense to go with Torch.

 
 
Posted by tuffy100 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

no, that's the new curve touch, not the Torch 2

 
 
Posted by Jimcmf Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Looks pretty good to me.
If it's anything like that youtube video demo, I'm quite sure that it will be a pretty big hit.

 
 
Posted by ChristianACC Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Damn that 9850 looks sick!!

 
 
Posted by greatness10 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

wtf! this is just getting stupid now

 
 
Posted by Slash82 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Torch?
No, it´s a Storm3!

 
 
Posted by Bla1ze Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Storm is dead.. let it die like it should have from the start.

 
 
Posted by Revyrah Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

Let the Storm LIVE Bla1ze, lol. Stop HATING on it. Lazaridis was quoted as saying that "SurePress is here to stay" in the All Things D interview before the S2 emerged.

That phone is no where near as bad as you're trying to make people believe. It needed better guts-yes, but SurePress was awesome for many of us. The OS sucked, but I loved the Storm2.

Storm sans SurePress makes more sense. It's far closer to a storm than a Torch. Otherwise we could make the argument that the Bold 9900/9930 should be a Torch without the slider as it's both touch screen and full qwerty.

 
 
Posted by zensen Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

I personally like the storm. it just needed better software.

 
 
Posted by sidds18 Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

Couldnt agree more...it is a great phone! wanted it to b faster ie more responsive i guess.

 
 
Posted by blackberry-pimp Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Noooo! Those physical buttons just look horrible! Please let them be touch! And according to other rumors it won't be called the BlackBerry Torch, instead the Volt.

 
 
Posted by birdman_36 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

I wonder if they'd run into legal issues with General Motors for that?

 
 
Posted by Jake Storm Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 238 days ago

I've never seen the General Motors phone. How do you like it?

 
 
Posted by birdman_36 Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

Past articles on Crackberry have stated RIM chose not to name this new candybar device the "BlackBerry Touch" in fear of a lawsuit from Apple for copying the name of one of their products (which isn't even a phone). What I was wondering is if GM would go after them as they already have a product called the "Volt" (which also isn't a phone).

Sorry if I wasn't making myself clear, but I think you could have replied in a much more intelligent manner.

 
 
Posted by shlammed Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

That's a Monaco bro.

 
 
Posted by cespinal26 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

9850 looks cheap. A trackpad on a touchscreen would give you a means for more precise selection of smaller objects on websites i.e. the bottom of forum pages where you would like to select the next page, those numbers are usually small and would be easier to select with the trackpad. Can't wait for that Bold!

 
 
Posted by BerryGuy25 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

I'm pretty confident to say that the one on the left is a Blackberry TOUCH prototype.

Of course, the one on the right is the Blackberry BOLD TOUCH.

 
 
Posted by Krypto Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 238 days ago

The 9850/9860 are not being called BB Touch. Sprint documentation says its a Torch, and I also got separate info from another carrier that says the same. Regardless of what you guys might think, its a Torch, and indeed, that should make sense given the model numbers.

 
 
Posted by jebulls Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

I think the 4 buttons and trackpad could have advantages. But the buttons look weird for some reason?

 
 
Posted by WillieLee Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

They stick out pretty far, that's why. Breaks up the flat nature of the rest of the phone.

 
 
Posted by sidds18 Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 237 days ago

they look wiered and moreover dust will accumulate pretty soon like in the earlier BB phones.

 
 
Posted by maevinj Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

Are those phones really small or is a giant holding them?

 
 
Posted by Jake Storm Thursday, Jun 30, 2011 238 days ago

LOL.
They must be just right, because in other pictures the 9900 looks large.

 
 
Posted by velkcro Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

MY goodness WTF is RIM thinking i was so amped for the blackberry touch/torch w.e they call it until this!!

are you f*ing kidding me they better delay that phone and fix those buttons, i hope someone that have close ties with RIM is reading this because this is one very very angry fan!!

the phone is ugly and if they release that phone i would honestly buy an android until QNX phones come out and i dont want to get an Android phone but RIM is giving me no choice.

 
 
Posted by Charlieo132 Wednesday, Jun 29, 2011 238 days ago

then go buy an android and stop crying. the phones haven't even been released. im sure blackberry will take your money when you come crawling back.