BREAKING: HTC One X and EVO 4G LTE imports stalled by U.S. customs
Join Our 3 MILLION+ Members Today! Register Here | Login
Login or Register to post comments

24 Comments

Posted by Kiddo_24 Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

That's real good to know! As in, I'm glad I don't have to view the ads, but not getting developers to jump on board because they can't monotize, well, hmm

 
 
Posted by D_shak Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

Would this affect the apps like the kindle app? If they only give us an android app and not a native app will we be able to get new books or would we only be able to read the ones we have?

 
 
Posted by Concession Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

Well, if that is true, it is definitely not true in the beta.

I have the android Chrono Trigger music app open right now. Ad is at the bottom of the screen.

Xbox Live and PSN manager also has an ad.

 
 
Posted by Concession Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

Ooo. Just noticed:

If you click an ad, it opens in the android browser in the android app player. In there, you can open the android browser's menu and there is an option "View in PlayBook Browser" and when you touch that, it opens the webpage in the Playbook's browser.

Cool.

 
 
Posted by jayemmbee Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

Where did you get the PSN manager from?

 
 
Posted by Concession Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

Appworld...

 
 
Posted by c4v3man Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

That's gotta change long term. The market has spoken, and people would rather have free apps with ads than have to pay for all their apps. I love the choice, to have an ad based version, and a premium version with no ads. Allows me to have a full demo of the product for free, and pay if I want to support the developer...

App World will continue to have a small number of apps if advertising isn't permitted...

 
 
Posted by BB10FTW Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

I actually believe this is a good move because it means native apps still have the edge over ported apps. RIM needs native apps to have the upperhand otherwise people will just port over Android apps and there won't be a ton of incentive for developers to start developing just for the Playbook and not for Android first.
I also hate ads in my apps, they annoy me to no end. Some apps implement it well and it isn't as terrible but others are horrible.
I just want to see some native apps coming our way, I don't mind the Android apps but I am much more interested in getting some awesome native apps especially once Cascades is released to developers.

 
 
Posted by koool1 Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

RIM allowing these developers in is the first step to getting them writing native Playbook apps - it's a really smart move.

Playbook is the breeding ground for BB10 apps, when those new phones are released there could be as many apps for BB10 as there are for BB6/7.

The RIMpire will be back!

 
 
Posted by easydoesit99 Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

Well somebody's wearing the rose coloured glasses. You really think developers are doing this out of the goodness of their heart? Hello? Man, I heard people are nuts but you have taken the cake today. Developers aare gonna disappear faster than you can say "Playbook" when they learn they can't place ads and no app-in purchasing. Seriously, get a brain!

 
 
Posted by BerryClever Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

It is much more important to have developers to build higher quality native apps than just port over Android apps. Get them on board first, and then let them make quality apps for the Playbook. They have the choice to make it free, make it cost, or make 2 versions with different features once they make a nice native app.

Speaking as an Android owner, the OS's app quality is generally awful (my opinion), and I wouldn't pay or support a 5 minute conversion. If they make a native app, well that means I would want to support their time and energy.

 
 
Posted by gord888 Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

I don't like to sift through all the crappy apps anyways, so, no biggie. Hopefully some big name apps will hit the app world instead.

 
 
Posted by easydoesit99 Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

Do you know how the big name apps got to be big name app? Advertising and ease of purchase.

 
 
Posted by greatwiseone Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

It's funny that the article talks about RIM dropping the ball on Android apps. Frankly, the point is to have people on the platform and use the awesome tools they have, and to offset the "gap" in app numbers that analysts and people are so fixated on.

 
 
Posted by BerryClever Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

Agreed. Quality Playbook apps with the filler of Android apps. They are trying to keep both quality people and quantity people happy. Hopefully they will be right and they can get some of the Android developers to use their tools to make some amazing apps!

 
 
Posted by buffandsweet33 Friday, Feb 17, 2012 88 days ago

this is such great news. i must admit it. i'm an app whore!!!love my android apps on my smartphone and i'm really gone love them on my playbook.

 
 
Posted by gorang Saturday, Feb 18, 2012 88 days ago

rim made a great strategy on how to get devs on board. when they started with 'playbook for an app' deal i got skeptical that devs would just pick up PB and not come back. this way rim can show them that they will have higher number of downloads and it will give them more encouragement to came back and make better quality native apps and make more $.

 
 
Posted by ice4u2 Saturday, Feb 18, 2012 88 days ago

"RIM does not feel as though this will have a huge negative impact on the PlayBook.".

Now where have I heard this before? Oh yeah...back in April during the initial launch concerning email, calander, and contacts.

 
 
Posted by ichat Saturday, Feb 18, 2012 88 days ago

Wow. Typo on first line :P

"reched"

Hmm.....

 
 
Posted by BitPusher2600 Saturday, Feb 18, 2012 88 days ago

Would this be a bad time to shout for a little Netflix :)

 
 
Posted by birdman_36 Saturday, Feb 18, 2012 88 days ago

Not at all!

 
 
Posted by montanova Sunday, Feb 19, 2012 87 days ago

If I were RIM. I'll let every app. from android market charge the user for 0.99$ for their free app.
but they should let the user have a few days to try it first :) Anyone agree with this ?
I'm the one who go for it. I like my playbook. I think, It's very stable
I don't mind to pay a buck to get free app from android market. :D

 
 
Posted by kongee28 Sunday, Feb 19, 2012 86 days ago

does it mean apk file can be installed in PB in OS 2.0?

 
 
Posted by _Florian_ Tuesday, Feb 21, 2012 84 days ago

Why in havent got the android player, in already got os 2.0?